340
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by grandma@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 4 months ago

Due to its mode of operation, the court considered the software to be “specifically intended for criminals”

Crime is an action a state doesn't like, not necessarily wrong or evil, but serves interests other than the state. If the state has to authorize everything, then the state is favoring dominance over governance.

When the state has to monitor all transactions it is tyranny.

[-] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

The state is just the abstraction of the collective will of the governed, if the Dutch people have determined this is a crime against their society, then it is.

The state holds a monopoly on violence, another monopoly isn’t a stretch.

[-] mukt@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 months ago

For an entity hat already has monopoly over violence, how difficult is it to claim monopoly over the collective will?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
340 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

31283 readers
1007 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS