108
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II

Talk page

All-weather?

Aren't most planes weatherproof? As a layman, the inclusion of "all-weather" in the lede is puzzling, especially as there's no other mention of "weather" in the article and no link for context. I gather from a search of the Talk archives that the plane has been accused of being vulnerable to lightning (ironic or what?), and this could be in response to that accusation? AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 09:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ultraviolet@hexbear.net 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

All-weather means the planes are equipped with better radar systems allowing them to perform operations in poor weather and/or night operations. It's an evolution of the night-fighter from WW2 since the radar systems on night fighters also gave them the capabilities to operate in poor weather conditions compared to the contemporary "standard" fighters.

[-] Maoo@hexbear.net 6 points 6 months ago

I object to this on the grounds that knowing things that make Anerikkkan failures less funny is revisionist.

[-] Xx_Aru_xX@hexbear.net 5 points 6 months ago

What's the point of that if it rusts when it rains, it's like giving audiophile 1500$ headphones to a dead person

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
108 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13551 readers
714 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS