I know this won't fix everything but I also think it's a good idea. First past the post contributes to problems we have now. Check it out people!

The one for Washington State is https://fairvotewa.org/

Minnesota's.

Minnesota's group is approaching this a smart way, from the local up. They're not spending much time in the high-profile positions; they're tackling local elections. Gets people used to the idea, and they stack higher and higher positions as they're going. It'll take time, but starting at the top and working down is a lot harder.

Is this how CA is approaching it?

Commenting in support!

Is there one for every state? Better question: is there a page that I can link to literally everyone that lists every such group by state?

Thank you for this!

I'll preface this by saying that near any voting system, ranked choice voting included, is better than FPTP. That being said, ranked choice voting does have some issues. Some that, arguably, can make it almost as bad as FPTP. To be more specific for this argument, I'll focus on the IRV type. The main negative aspects of this voting system are that it doesn't satisfy the monotonicity and Condorcet criterions. Regarding this topic, I highly recommend reading this article. It is very well written, and very informative.