289
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 51 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Being underdeveloped in infrastructure and its original history and identity broken and exploited by the west and currently china.

I cant believe it’s doing well on economic output in comparison with those established exploiters.

Now on why the fuck is this rhetoric even relevant to a cool map guid in how our perspective of size on earth is distorted?

[-] nahuse@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

I’m assuming the poster doesn’t speak English as a first language, so I’m hopeful it was a more innocent question than the racist dog whistle it seems like at first glance.

I can see why one might be curious about the economic comparisons between different geographic spaces with vast sizes, even though it’s almost impossible to really answer.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

I'm not feeling as charitable as you. The fact that they started with "no offense" tells me they know they're saying something offensive. I think it's a way of saying "Sure they're geographically big, but they don't contribute as much to the world as western (white?) countries.

[-] nahuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

I've read some of his commebts, and it's the worse answer. He is...kind of a shitbag.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
289 points (93.7% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3407 readers
5 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS