295
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

This was festering long before the Internet. Where do you think Margaret Atwood got the idea of the Handmaids Tale from?

[-] mynachmadarch@kbin.social 29 points 6 months ago

It's complicated, but some would argue the modern Internet started in 1986 (with the adoption of DNS and TCP/IP for the NFSNET), a full year after Handmaid's Tale was published even.

But yeah, Atwood stated she took inspiration from religious movements in the 1980s to oppress women, the Islamic revolution in Iran in the 1970s and it's effect on women, and the pushback in late 1940s against women working after the war ended.

All of this prexisted the Internet by a long shot.

[-] almar_quigley@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

That is a technicality. Nothing was being shared at the breadth needed to influence large portions of the population back in the 80’s.

[-] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social -5 points 6 months ago

I was born in the back half of the 90's and can confidently say that you're wrong. Sharing information existed long before the Internet and cell phones.

[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I think they meant specifically nothing on the internet.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 months ago

That's not what he said though, he said it wasn't shared to the same quantity, which is easily demonstrated by looking at total internet traffic stats as well as % of households with a connection and the type and speed of that connection over the past 30 years.

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It started with Jerry Falwell standing to lose money from desegregation. Here is an article / short podcast from NPR that lays most of it on the table.There is more to the story, but I was unable to find a good source in the short time I was willing to search.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Phyllis Schlafly started all this back when Jerry Falwell was still fumbling around.

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that's part of it, but I'm not willing to post stuff in this kind of context without a ready source.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

A centuries-long tradition of dystopian sci fi and also watching Republicans?

this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
295 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1965 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS