155
submitted 5 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

The U.S. military finished installing a floating pier for the Gaza Strip on Thursday, with officials poised to begin ferrying badly needed humanitarian aid into the enclave besieged over seven months of intense fighting in the Israel-Hamas war.

The final, overnight construction sets up a complicated delivery process more than two months after U.S. President Joe Biden ordered it to help Palestinians facing starvation as food and other supplies fail to make it in as Israel recently seized the key Rafah border crossing in its push on that southern city on the Egyptian border.

Fraught with logistical, weather and security challenges, the maritime route is designed to bolster the amount of aid getting into the Gaza Strip, but it is not considered a substitute for far cheaper land-based deliveries that aid agencies say are much more sustainable. The boatloads of aid will be deposited at a port facility built by the Israelis just southwest of Gaza City and then distributed by aid groups.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

The article states that the World Food Program will be delivering the aid. After seeing the tragic IDF attacks, as well as Hamas hoarding and selling food, shouldn’t the aid be delivered by military personnel?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 months ago

You need military personnel from a country willing to do that. No one would trust Israel, Biden isn't doing that in an election year. Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria don't really care about Palestinians, or would make things worse with their presence. The US would block a UN presence more than likely. Europe is a bit preoccupied with Ukraine, and wouldn't put troops into another war zone with limited up side.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

According to the article, the US military is in charge of the boat routes and overseeing military checkpoints. I’m just suggesting they drive the truck.

Biden has been pushing for aid to get safely into Gaza. That’s why the US built the dock in the first place. Why would the US block UN assistance in delivering aid?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Because Israel doesn't want the UN involved at all.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

UN members are still providing humanitarian and defensive aid. The UK helped shoot down Iranian drones, and has been assisting in defending Israel from attacks in the Red Sea. They’ve provided Gaza with 150 tonnes of aid, including more than 13,000 blankets and 840 family-sized tents, entered Gaza on 13 March 2024.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-aid-en-route-to-temporary-pier-off-gaza

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Individual nations are involved. The only presence the UN had was UNRWA and Netanyahu made sure they (mostly) disappeared ... although currently an UNRWA health clinic is being shelled by the IDF. Source

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I see your point, but it’s hard to tell if that’s the IDF targeting the UN or Gaza aid in general. They’ve been openly critical of both, but they’ve also attacked World Central Kitchen twice.

https://wck.org/news/amro

[-] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Pretty sure they don’t want to risk being dragged into yet another conflict in the Middle East. If someone got killed, hawkish republicans would demand an invasion and US troops

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They’re already present as escorts through most of the route. I’m just suggesting they deliver the aid directly to discourage Israel and Hamas from targeting workers again. Both groups know better than to challenge the US military.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

It wouldn't be just delivering aid. Once the military is there it's a military operation. Their goal can be protecting aid, but that also means they likely have to fire on hamas raids, or even the Israel army at some point and either case is bad for everyone.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

In that case the best they could do is escort wherever legally possible to maintain it as delivery of aid while still offering protection. Do you have a source that explains the designation for military operation if the military delivers aid?

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Do you have a source that explains the designation for military operation if the military delivers aid?

You won't find any because no one wants to get near having their military force in Israel for any reason. It's political suicide (not to mention the fact America's armed forces are already short personnel).

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Again, the US military is already facilitating the transport for the aid. It’s being delivered by a humanitarian organization, with the help of the US military.

Also, the US armed forces have not left Israel. They have maintained consistent presence since the early ‘90s. The only two active military installations in Israel are American bases.

this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

World News

38921 readers
2332 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS