Yes, I know, you are objecting to my using the word 'civility' by taking it entirely out of the context of the post.

Here is the context including why I said it to the OP:

OP: "All of that changed with the recent “bear vs man” debacle. I saw women get shouted down just for expressing their stories of being sexually abused, repeatedly harassed, dogpiled, and brigaded with downvotes."

Me: Every community I moderate has a civility rule, and shouting down or harassing women who are telling personal stories would be against those rules.

You: 🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻

So yeah, I get that you are objecting to my using a single word when, taken out of context, means that I expect people to be polite all the time and not speak up when there's some injustice. Of course, I didn't mean that, as you can tell from what I literally said, or my comment history which you claimed to have read when I myself do that frequently, but you would much rather argue with something I never said or intended to say or even implied.

And your "proof" was me telling someone who was specifically telling me how I was a bad moderator that other people didn't seem to agree which meant I was bragging about being a really good person, something you still refuse to acknowledge is not true.

Honestly, it seems like you just wanted to get angry at someone and I was an available target.

So, again, fine, I'm a shitty person.

I'm also a shitty person who's going to keep a very close eye on you if you post in communities that I moderate in from now on because you just lie and lie and lie and I will not tolerate that where I moderate.

And that is my last post in this conversation.