You haven't answered my questions and constantly duck and weave.

Have I not answered questions? What haven't I answered? I'm happy to go back and address things if you feel like I evaded something.

Here, I'll extend an olive branch. I can list several things, and you can tell me where you disagree.

Capitalism has the following flaws:

Sure.

1. Ownership of Capital by individuals results in a class conflict between Workers and Owners, resulting in a tumultuous society

Agree

2. Production of commodities for profit rather than use results in products designed to make profits rather than fulfill uses, ie enshittification

Agree

3. Capitalism cannot exist forever because of the Tendency for the Rate of Profit to Fall, which leads to Imperialism and eventually fascism and collapse

I mean, a building can't last forever because of its tendency to decay and fall apart, but then if you maintain it properly, it's fine, for long enough to be useful.

I think this is the core of our disagreement: I would agree about the tendency, but not the inevitability. Like I said, I think that particular elements (strong labor unions and a strong-in-practice democratic government) can constrain capitalism to where it functions well and gives a good world to the people connected to it, but doesn't take over and become a destructive force (as it is today to a large extent).

It sounds like you're saying that the flaws are unfixable and so capitalism has to be rejected in order to make a good system. Which, I mean maybe, but in my mind that's unproven.

It also sounds like you're saying that because of these flaws, we need to replace capitalism specifically with communism or socialism and asserting that it'll be better. Which again, I mean maybe, but it seems like you're being consistently evasive about the details of what that would mean (either through details or a historical example), which makes it conveniently easy to hold up the theory of how wonderful it could be, against the actual reality of how capitalism is in practice, and assert that of course it would work better than capitalism in practice, because capitalism has these problems.