It reminded me of high-frequency trading.

Mind, the people who do that are the victims here!

I didn't explain how exactly they were harmed. It's actually kinda funny, too.

It costs virtually nothing to create crypto-tokens. So that's what people do. Do some wash trades, slip some money to influencers to hype their new token as the next big thing, then offload the whole supply and run with the money. The "investors" quickly discover that these tokens are only good for one thing: To sell to a greater fool. At that point, there are no more buyers.

The accused obtained such useless tokens. The indictment doesn't say how. I guess they simply bought it for next to nothing.

Effectively, they tricked the victims' bots into buying these tokens at face value. The victims were left with crypto supposedly worth $25 million but in reality unsellable. If this was stealing $25 million, then I wonder about the legality of selling these crypto tokens in the first place.

Eventually, all crypto is like that. Some cryptocurrencies are used as payment systems, but eventually something better must come along. Then that currency becomes unsellable. Someone must always be left holding the bag, as it is said in crypto circles.

I think they are guilty of fraud. But I do wonder: If we are to accept that leaving someone with worthless crypto is equal to stealing money, what does that mean for the legality of crypto as a whole?