148
We're Watching Facebook Die (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 5 months ago by JRepin@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

In the first quarter of 2024, Meta made $36.45 billion dollars - $12.37 billion dollars of which was pure profit. Though the company no longer reports daily active users, it now uses another metric: “family daily active people.” This number refers to “registered and logged-in users of one or more of Facebook’s Family products who visited at least one of these products on a particular day.”

This quiet, seemingly innocent change to how Meta reports growth is significant insofar as it will no longer have to report its Daily Active or Monthly active users, meaning that the only source of truth in Meta’s growth story is a vague growth metric that could be manipulated to mean just about anything. Three billion “daily active people” across Meta’s “family” combines WhatsApp, Instagram, Facebook, Facebook Messenger (which I’m confident it counts separately), Oculus, and Threads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

It is more that they are not growing, and that means dying in their business model. By not reporting an accurate metric of user engagement, they are hiding the stagnation or loss. Background logins from apps are likely also hiding the real picture of user engagement. Without active user engagement they lose their revenue, data harvesting and advertising.

So there are signs that they are in a downturn, which will lead to irrelevance and failure.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 46 points 5 months ago

Once upon a time, after growth companies would shift from a growth stock to a stable stock. Instead of telling wall street "you can make money here" it would mean "you can keep your money relatively safe here". We apparently don't do that anymore. Seems like it would have been perfect for them.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

That would work if they had a stable business model and produced something everybody needed or wanted, like diapers or alcohol. Their entire business model requires they keep users engaged and user count growing.

People will leave Meta the more Meta tries to make more off of a stagnant userbase, which will death spiral.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 4 points 5 months ago

For sure, they don't know how to be a stable revenue, or how to retain users. So we get this clusterfck

[-] redbr64@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

"like diapers or alcohol" lol. That resonates to me as a parent

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

we used to call that 'value investing' and get rewarded with reliable dividends. useful during periods of high interest rates, which stunted growth.

[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml -3 points 5 months ago

I think you're reading more into that than there is.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago
[-] digdilem@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

No, and never did - but I don't understand your point. Facebook started only a year after Myspace did.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
148 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

34821 readers
18 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS