840
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 128 points 1 year ago

Trump being worse deosn't mean we can't criticize Biden right now as the sitting president. I have been very supportive of the need to vote for Biden over Trump, but the Democrats need to stop doubling down on denying the atrocities in Gaza already.

Like they aren't even using nuance or anything at this point. Threateninng the ICC is absolutely ridiculous.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago

This is unilaterally discrediting our country on the world stage. Trump was bad enough, but we could tell the world over half the county opposed him, and that he lost the popular vote.

This guy won the popular vote, and he's out there supporting genocide. What a fucking embarrassment to humanity these "leaders" are. Fuck them both.

Obligatory yes, I will be voting for Biden again to fend off Trump. I'll like it even less than I did last time, though.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

You are absolutely not obligated to say who you will be voting for.

If anything you've undercut your 'fuck them both' by following it with 'but of course I will be supporting THIS ONE SPECIFICALLY'.

Do what you want at the voting booth but don't undercut your own message by announcing your hand.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

First things first.

Criticizing Biden is fine, and everyone should, for the first three years and six months.

Also, if it wasn’t clear, Biden is super pissed off at Bibi for all his shit. But once trump is defeated we’ll all dogpile on. (Agree dissing ICC is vr bad as well fwiw)

Until then, there is not much difference between “not voting bc genoside” / “grr biden genocide democrats” and https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/09/16/1035851/facebook-troll-farms-report-us-2020-election/

I can only think people either are very aware of it (because it’s exactly right) or not aware of it at all, possibly their first time eligible to vote.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

Bibi may lose this election for Biden, and spiral the world downward. This will only strengthen the ties the US has with Israel, however. Trump would absolutely throw a ton of weight behind them, and perhaps even involve the US directly in the genocide.

Bibi doesn't give a shit about Biden, and Biden is showing an astonishing amount of weakness by not standing up to him. I'm fucking embarrassed for him, and the entire democratic party.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

If the only possible outcome is a strengthening of relations with a genocidal colonial project then the American democratic experiment has been dead for a long time

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

the American democratic experiment has been dead for a long time

Yes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 34 points 1 year ago

But once trump is defeated we’ll all dogpile on.

So one of the other things that is very frustrating is always being told that we just need to wait until after the next election to criticize anything. Our election cycles never seem to end.

[-] androogee@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah man life is really fuckin frustrating. Welcome to earf.

[-] eltrain123@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You absolutely should not be waiting until the next election cycle. You should be voicing your opinion, voting in off-cycle and local elections, and voting for the least harmful option in every election, including the presidential election. It’s a huge machine and voting once every 4 years for the pre-packaged candidate isn’t an effective strategy if you actually want things to change.

Vote for people that make things better in your community, city, county, state, and then think about federal elections. Displacing the trove of do-nothings or detrimental actors in the smaller elections will change sentiment in the parties and will change the candidates they put through in the primaries… but it will take years for that to happen.

Either that or revolution… but that’s going to be a whole lot worse for everyone for a few decades, best case scenario.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

That's kind of how 'self rule' works. You're supposed to pay attention to politics.

People not voting is how we got in this mess in the first place.

Why do you think the GOP's final defense is always "both sides do it?"

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

TIL self rule is when you can't criticize the government

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

TIL telling people to get involved in politics and to go out and vote is exactly the same as telling them to not criticize the government.

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

People won't do those things unless they realize that Democratic neoliberal orthodoxy is also the enemy.

Criticizing Biden with the goal of awakening the people should be encouraged

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

So, in a few words, tell me how you intend to reshape the entire political landscape of the United States and usurp both major Parties.

I've had folks tell me since high school that the Revolution was just around the corner, and the masses would rise and rebuild.

What's so special about your plan?

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

how you intend to reshape the entire political landscape of the United States

Unions and democratic socialism. Aka, the Sanders methodology - and, aka, the way we got the New Deal

The alternative is either doing nothing and allowing conditions to continue to deteriorate, or supporting an armed revolution that will be instantly massacred by the most powerful military in human history. Neither are plausible options in the face of oligarchy

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You're hilarious. They got the New Deal by electing FDR. Without politicians in the White House and Congress, none of it would have happened.

You speak against voting, and then mention an elected official [Sanders] and a government policy [the New Deal]

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Bull, to the fucking shit. Genocide isn’t just something you can fucking put off. Unless you don’t really care about the genocide. Seems you’re more upset at the optics. And let’s also mention that Biden is not any more angry at the genocide than you seem to be. All his moves are token and theater and even that was only bought with mass protests and plunging confidence numbers.

People are being genocided ‘TODAY’

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Also, if it wasn’t clear, Biden is super pissed off at Bibi for all his shit.

It really fucking isn't. At all. He recently went full genocide denier on Bibi's behalf.

This is the reasonable take.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Democrats have no choice but to condemn the ICC and deny the genocide is happening because for some completely unknown reason the electorate has been lead to believe Israel is a good, moral state actor with absolutely no ill-intent and has never done anything wrong that was unjustified.

Now if they ever lie to me about Israel and I find out about it....

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

Every time Bibi claims that the IDF is the most moral army in the world I roll my eyes.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Undermining the ICC is tradition for the USA. There's plenty of people waiting in line to get US soldiers, officers and politicians denounced at the ICC the day they're capable of prosecuting US citizens.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

We needed to get someone back in office who could potentially do something about the atrocities. Instead we elected someone who will double down. That wasn’t a good plan

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think anyone is denying the atrocities. Or at least none that I’ve seen-

But what I AM seeing is a lot of people that understand the nuance in the situation, and trying to explain that not voting is going to get Trump. I also see people coming back to challenge this in bad faith knowing it’s been explained to them many times over.

But we’re not allowed to call these people what they are. So we have to play along with it and pretend it’s all legitimate.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

The only reason you feel you have to pretend that it's legitimate is because it's true on face-value: democrats have chosen a losing position and are going to lose because of it. Rather than pledging fealty before we need to it's far more important to work to get democrats to ammend their policy

Wishing people would ignore the issue and hold their nose isn't a strategy to keep Trump out, it's denial

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A fact of living in a liberal democracy is that residents have the right to openly criticize the government

If that right is no longer exercisable then we are already lost

If Dems don't like what voters are saying then they should change their policy. Very simple solution.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
840 points (78.8% liked)

Political Memes

8145 readers
2061 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS