615
important rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 4 months ago by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is a common argument against affirmative action (which was not repealed in the US overall, just banned in a few very conservative states (although if I missed some major news about it being repealed on a federal level please don't hesitate to educate me) ), I'm addressing that common counterargument by saying that it's not what anti-racism seeks to do. Same as the example counterargument before it. That one's referring to the types who spout nonsense such as "But that's just being racist to white people!!1!". They're correct that it wouldn't be helpful, but incorrect in their assessment that that's the main goal of the movement.

That said, I do think that some movements and initiatives, which I will preemptively decline to name because the details and scope of these initiatives are irrelevant, are misguided in how they want to bring about equity. These movements do feed into the arguments of people who claim that affirmative action is just giving queer/nonwhite/poor/otherwise marginalized people special privileges, and that's why I want to set them aside as separate from the concept as anti-racist.

[-] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 months ago

Makes sense. Appreciate the elaboration!

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
615 points (100.0% liked)

196

16381 readers
1938 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS