931
submitted 8 months ago by ElCanut@jlai.lu to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 75 points 8 months ago

The color grading of the years is really bad. The last 20/30 years are all very low in contrast compared to each other, while 1940s and 60s are easy to tell apart, where it is least important. There are so many more colors than yellow/orange/brown, we can use them to get more information density.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 17 points 8 months ago

Quite the contrary. I have a red-green deficiency (and so do about 6% of men). Viridis Color scale is pretty nice but two much colors are hard to read for a lot of people

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 8 months ago

We need to invent an image format that let's chart colorw be tweaked after the fact lol

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Actually, that's a feature that was common going all the way back to the very earliest image file formats: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indexed_color

It'd be easy enough to make the chart a plain old GIF or indexed PNG; the only non-trivial part is that you'd need add some code to the page it's embedded in to swap out the color palette. (You could also make it an SVG and manipulate it even more easily using the DOM.)

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 0 points 8 months ago

Well, the image format is based on indexed color for compression purposes ... But it's not like it calls out "these indexes should be customizable".

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
931 points (99.2% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

9 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS