429
Fedora Silverblue is the most frustrating distro so far
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
429 points (94.0% liked)
Linux
48376 readers
1916 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Only thing I haven't figured out, yet, is how to install the Private Internet Access client. It uses a
.runinstall script, and it fails when installing viarpm-ostree(tries to write to/etc) and doesn't like being installed in a Distrobox (needs systemd).But yeah, I'm currently looking at some other options for my main system to drop Windows, and I'm always comparing to Fedora Atomics, now.
Any program with an install script makes assumptions about your system, if it doesn't work it just isn't compatible.
Either modify the script, package the software for your distro or find out if someone else has done it.
My first instinct would be to look if it's in the AUR and install it inside an Arch Toolbox.
Yeah, third-party Linux VPN clients are pretty screwed on silverblue, and probably always will be. Especially since when installed in a container, they require being ran in a rootful container with selinux labeling disabled to enable direct access to /dev/net/tun, and as you’ve quickly found out, most of those weird bash based installers haven’t adapted. It’s best to use generic VPN configs through your DE atm.
I don’t use PIA, but /opt and /etc are both r/w in Silverblue/Kionite
I'll have to give that a try, then. Doesn't work on Bazzite.
why not use fedora's built-in openvpn client and just add the pia info? That should likely work. https://helpdesk.privateinternetaccess.com/guides/linux/linux-installing-openvpn-through-the-terminal
or built-in wireguard client? https://helpdesk.privateinternetaccess.com/guides/linux/alternative-setups-4/linux-manual-connection-scripts
I do use OVPN. PIA didn't have a standalone WG config apart from their client when I last checked, so I'll have to look at that second article and see if it's workable, because the other issue is ease of use (I'm not the only one using it, you see).
Thanks for the info, though! Might solve my last hangup.
you can unlock your /usr with rpm-ostree usroverlay
Oh, hmm. I'll have to look at that. I didn't know you could unlock the overlay for specific folders
you can unlock the file system, don't remember how tho
Wouldn't help, because any changes I make would be wiped out on the next update (plus it kind of defeats the purpose of an immutable system). I don't want to go down that road, primarily because the maintenance needs to be as easy as clicking a button (I'm not the only user, so ease of use is necessary).
The better option would be to have it live in the filesystem overlay, but I can't seem to get that to work. It's possible that it could be a flatpak, as ProtonVPN has their client as a flatpak, but PIA doesn't seem all that interested in throwing any bones to Linux users.