665
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tramort@programming.dev 35 points 6 months ago

I didn't know that! Great link!

But "reckless disregard for truth" seems to be perfectly suitable here

And it's not about money. It's about forcing consequences on attorneys who are willing to make insane arguments to help Trump.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

It is about money in that such lawsuits cost money. And they take a lot of time. This isn't something the DOJ could do, this would be a civil suit brought by Biden himself. I just don't think it's worth it.

[-] Tramort@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Of course the DOJ would be uninvolved.

I'm talking about a personal suit by Biden: he's the victim of the slander.

It would be the best money Biden could spend. Nothing else is going to stop the reckless dishonesty by Trump supporters and attorneys.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

He's in the middle of a campaign and you want him to put it on hold to go to court?

[-] Tramort@programming.dev -3 points 6 months ago

For the one hour that it takes to provide testimony and cross examination? Yes.

This is his lawyer's time, not POTUS' time

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

1 hour of testimony in a simple divorce proceeding for a blue-collar worker is the result of dozens or hundreds of hours of working with the attorney on documentation and preparation. I imagine it would be an order of magnitude more work if it's the POTUS suing for defamation. It also feeds into the "both sides" narrative to see Biden sitting in a courtroom, same as Trump. It doesn't matter that Biden's not the defendant, and it doesn't matter that it's a civil matter instead of a criminal one because the footage of Biden in a courtroom is more than enough to sell that story to the sycophants.

[-] Tramort@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

In a divorce case you need testimony to understand what the other spouse did.

In a slander case what evidence does Biden need to testify about?

All the evidence is a matter of public record.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
665 points (98.4% liked)

News

23644 readers
2683 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS