108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
108 points (95.0% liked)
World News
32323 readers
1194 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Well they've taken more land back in the last couple months than Russia took in the last year, so there's that.
Russia were kicked out of Kyiv
Russia were kicked out of Kharkiv
Russia were kicked out of Kherson
The reclamation of Russian held Ukrainian land in the east and the south appears to be accelerating.
Russia is resorting to fielding T-54s and T-55s (how embarrassing 😬 )
Putins support at home appears to be slipping
Ukraine has the full support of the west
Russia barely has the tentative support of China
You're being lied to. You need to drop wherever you're getting your information, it's all completely false. These are fantasies.
So Russia still occupies the Kharkiv, Kherson and Kyiv regions do they?
Unfortunately they won't give you any sources to back up their claims, because they are projecting hard.
Russia never occupied Kiev, it pulled back after the peace agreement that Zelensky reneged on. Ukraine has lost its last army. It's over, they have no chance. Good riddance to the Nazi scum.
EDIT: A lot of triggered Nazis in here today.
They pulled back because the VDV were wiped out in the battle of hostomel airport and because they couldn't fuel their tanks where Ukrainians kept blowing up their logistics.
"Good will gesture" was an attempt by the Kremlin to save face while they shuffled back to Belarus with their tail between their legs.
This is out of date propaganda. They pulled back because of a peace treaty. It didn't make the news at the time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUslOD36Q-Q
dont post tankie youtubers as sources. it makes you look bad
Don't attack the messenger because you have no comeback. It makes you instantly concede the point.
You made a bold inaccurate claim citing a source video of someone making a bold inaccurate claim who cites no source.
Sigh... he mentions sources in the video if you like. His point in the video aswell was that there were very few sources. You're demanding something you know is impossible to provide, you're just being dishonest with yourself.
"THIS HAPPENED!!!!
I HAVE NO PROOF
THE ONLY PEOPLE SAYING IT HAPPENED ARE KNOWN LIARS
BELLLIEEEEVVVVEEEE MEEEE!!!!!!"
That's what you sound like
Okay then. Let's hear your take again?
Good to know that The Independent is lying media.
At no point during the video does RM cite The Independent as a source.
But even if he had:
The Independent is owned by a former KGB officer
Looking at this youtubers video catalog there is definitely a common theme among his videos.
Why accuse me of citing propaganda whilst sending me obvious propaganda?
Everything is propaganda. The question should be what is the truth?
The truth is Russia is the antagonist in this conflict and in many ways are what they accuse Ukraine of being
Okay?
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=gUslOD36Q-Q
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.