201
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
201 points (92.1% liked)
Fuck Cars
9663 readers
498 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sure, let's compare the Netherlands to the US - the US being nearly 24,000% larger in size and somehow it could possibly be just as bike-friendly. From its most narrow point, it is a comically short 80 miles or roughly 130 km.
Wow, talk about delusion.
Nobody is saying that we need to have a bike path going across the whole country. Most people don't leave their home city on a regular basis, and for those who do, we need to build trains, not more cars.
The cities are probably not build the same. The highways on several levels, the streets sizes, the places to live, work and buy stuff, everything was built around the use of cars since the 60s. And a train network doesn't build itself.
Not just built for the car: bulldozed for the car.
Exactly. We already bulldozed and rebuilt our cities once in the last 60 years. But that we demolishing density and replacing it with parking lots. Reversing that damage should be easier because a lot of it is just infill, much less demolition needed. There's no reason we can't fix it, and every reason we can't NOT fix it.
The roads didn't build themselves either. And most major cities were built around rail and walkability until the 50-60s. Before that it was expected that everyone could walk to their basic needs or transit if they lived in the city.
Canada has a bike path across our country: https://tctrail.ca
Note: some sections require canoe.
Ironically, the guy has an entire video dedicated to debunking the poor framing of this argument.
No one is trying to bike across the United States. Heck, hardly anyone crosses the United States period. The core issue usually relates just to city clusters in one area, and mostly relates to a single individual city with its suburbs, and how that city has used the space it has.
That fact that someone can conceded to realizing that the US is massive and thus would require (not a wish, but an actual requiremrnt) long distance transportation, and yet still mentions a country like the Netherlands in the same breathe means they are incredibly disingenuous in their thinking.
Here's a fun exercise! Name what other countries NJB uses as examples in his video!
Might be painful, because then it would mean you actually have to watch it instead of comment from total ignorance.
You think I give enough of a flying fuck to waste my time??? LOL you can't be for real.