2275
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today -2 points 2 years ago

If he did give away all of his money then by definition he did not have a safety net to fall back on, no?

Unless you mean being able to call on friends when in a bind. I must admit to not taking the time to watch all the videos, so I don't know what rules he set himself for that, but I suppose it could also count, if it was allowed.

But I mean, proving that theory was entirely the point, wasn't it? He didn't try making his first million from nothing, he already made it once and tried to repeat it. Of course he'd have some sort of relevant experience to fall back on, and generally, almost everything you've done once is easier the second time around (unless you get thrown an unexpected curveball like he did).

[-] kakes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

I'm the furthest thing from an expert on this whole situation, but the fact that he was able to "give up" being poor once he had a health problem implies to me that there definitely was a safety net.

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Fair point I guess, although like everyone else ITT I haven't watched the videos so we're all just speculating here, aren't we.

Also, earning five grand a month is not exactly what I'd consider "poor". In fact, it's just a grand shy of a median household income in the US.

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

almost everything you've done once is easier the second time around

And yet he still failed. He quit after 9 months, that's 3/4 of the way to his deadline. 62k is not even 1/10th of the goal. I get close to that just going to work every day.

[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 2 years ago

Easier != success is guaranteed

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
2275 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10970 readers
274 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS