59
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aaaaaaadjsf@hexbear.net 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I feel like a complete idiot for actually trying to give an honest answer about how you can disagree with something morally, but that doesn't mean that it must be illegal or punished by the state.

[-] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For example: cigarettes

I hate them, hate their smell, hate being around people who smoke, will never smoke myself and think they are killing people

I still don’t think they should be banned

Other examples would be interpersonal lying and cheating on your partner. Both are immoral, both should not be enforced by the state.

[-] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

I think they should be banned. They are quite literally cancer sticks.

[-] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 months ago

prohibiting substances does not have a great track record in terms of either effectiveness or collateral damage

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13484 readers
883 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS