261
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by TVgog56789@lemy.lol to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] blackstampede@sh.itjust.works 44 points 6 months ago

I agree. While we're at it, we can also make election day a holiday and require employers to give workers at least a paid half-day off so that they can vote, and create a citizenship ID that is free and easy to get rather than using ID with requirements like a driver's license. Then maybe we can try out ranked choice voting and eliminate the electoral college. You know, since we want the election to be fair.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

and create a citizenship ID that is free and easy to get rather than using ID with requirements like a driver's license.

Just a heads up, these already are a thing, you still have to go to the DMV to get it since they're the people who issue it, but they have IDs that are just "IDs" and then they have IDs that are also "drivers licenses." The one that is just an ID like you're talking about they just have to bring their birth cert, social security card, and proof of address like a bill or paystub or anything like that, then they fill out the info, take their pic, and voila, "Identification Card" without the driving priveleges.

People do it all the time, because without one you can't buy smokes, vapes, booze, go to 18+ concerts, have a job in some cases, hell watch porn in some states lol, etc, anything age restricted really.

[-] authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago

i remember reading that even those are highly inaccessible to minorities, in areas with large minority populations the offices are farther away/have weird hours/other obstacles that make them harder to acquire

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean, they all keep the same hours in my state and it seems like more of them are actually in the bad areas (where I happen to live myself, lol) rather than making the "rich neighborhoods look bad" with all the DMV offices. I can't speak for the entire country, but you'd think my area would be one of the worst with it if it were actually about stopping "the blacks" from acquiring them (US, South.) Also every single minority I know (which is actually a fair number, my area is diverse af,) has an ID and/or driver's license, so they definitely can get them.

Hell I know one dude, trans, half black, dad left as a kid because he was a crackhead, grew up poor with me, current heroin addict (hope he gets better before he dies like many of our other friends,) and he still has an ID. I think it may deadname him still, but he has one. I've actually never even met a single person over the age of 18 without one afaik, hell I know 4 homeless dudes and they have them. One lives in a tent and the other three just have sleeping bags under a bridge and they figured it out. I mean the address is a local shelter that lets them use the address specifically for this, but they do have one.

Tbh I think the whole "the blacks can't get IDs" thing is not only overstated, but also kinda racist, like how saying "we have to take care of women because they can't take care of themselves" is technically "nice" or whatever because they have good intentions but it's actually misogynistic af.

[-] authorinthedark@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago

https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/aclu_voter_id_fact_sheet_-_final_1.pdf

here we go I'm pretty sure this or a related summary is what I'd seen before, it wasn't a recent read so i might be wrong but it sounds familiar

[-] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

My state is similar to yours, dmv hours are same state wide and location wise they are not totally out of the way.

Same documents, birth cert, social card, 2 proofs of address.

Those requirements, while easy enough and even doable for the homeless, are harder for some than others, specifically the poor.

Those people who used shelter addresses didn't have to pay (thats national, first time and renewals are free to homeless.) Someone who is poor but not homeless has to pay. Also poor people often leave their parents home without their social and birth cert. Or have no where to safely store them and lose or have them stolen. Also, social security cards are not assigned to you at birth. If mom or dad never filed for one for you, congrats you get to do it as a adult. This can create a whole catch 22 style loop of them getting fucked.

Anyways, I'm not explaining myself well, but yes requiring state ID (non drivers license) to vote is prohibitive to a lot of otherwise entitled voters.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago

I am "the poor." Less so now, but still not "not," lol.

As far as the documents go, yeah, you need some, and can likely get them if they've been lost. The alternative is me claiming to be Elon Musk, getting an ID in his name, whole ass stealing his identity to fund my life (which while that sounds funny to me is a crime lol.) Really without some proof of identity there's no point to even have IDs at all.

State IDs are also required for another right, the right to bear arms. You can't buy a gun in the US without an ID, and buying a gun being a right much like the right to vote, if it's prohibitively hard to get an ID for one right so too must it be for all rights. Frankly you can kill more people with a vote, too.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago

Those aren't free, though.

At least in California I had to pay 26 bucks for mine 10 years ago

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago

Mine was $10. I agree they should be free but let's be real here $10-$26 isn't prohibitively expensive, my homeless friends would beg more than that in a few hours, even if you have to save a dollar a check that's still doable for something that by all accounts you do need, and for more than just "voting."

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

So you're saying that you believe some people should have to resort to begging for money in order to vote? I mean, I know you said you think they should be free but the rest of the paragraph makes it seem like you feel people having to pay to vote is okay.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago

More like "we should be helping people get IDs" but cute you ignored the "i think they should be free" for good boy internet points.

Seriously you think "black people can't get IDs" and instead of "we should help them get them" your first thought is to feel sorry for them and do nothing other than say "well we shouldn't have them for voting?" What's wrong with you? Again, they need IDs for more than just voting.

Frankly, if we did provide everyone with an ID like we should, what then would be your argument against it? Would it still be racist?

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Me: "I know you said you think they should be free..."

You: "...you ignored the "i think they should be free"..."

Wait, what? You've already started out with false statements, but let's continue:

You: "Seriously you think "black people can't get IDs"..."

When did I ever say that? What I was referring to was poor people that might have to decide between eating or paying for an ID. I never said that the poor people were black. That racist stuff was conjured up in your head. I'm actually offended by your assumption.

You ..."instead of "we should help them get them" your first thought is to feel sorry for them and do nothing other than say "well we shouldn't have them for voting?"

Again you're misunderstanding (or intentionally trolling) what I was actually saying. I was saying that your opinion that it's okay to charge people money to be able to vote was the antithesis of democracy. Everyone should be able to vote regardless of their socioeconomic status.

You: Frankly, if we did provide everyone with an ID like we should, what then would be your argument against it?

Again, I think your reading comprehension is amiss because we've been in agreement that ID should be free to all.

You: Would it still be racist?

I would like to once again remind everyone that I never mentioned race once. I was referring to poor people that can't afford an ID. Someone else made it racial.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Ignored, dismissed, use whatever word you like idgaf.

If you didn't say it reread the thread, that's what we're talking about over here. Dudes are posting whole ass ACLU links that actually are pretty convincing, catch up junior.

Again you ignore or dismiss the "free" part. Are you intentionally doing that or is your memory about the quality of a goldfish's?

OH so NOW we all agree it should be free but I want to charge money? Get your fucking story straight you pompous ass.

Again catch up. But fine "if we did provide IDs like we should, would it still be classist?"

Fucking christ lmao. You ok?

[-] uis@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

USSA is not car-centric country, it is car-ruled country.

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago

Ok c/fuckcars, calm down. Just because you have to get the non-drivers-license-ID at a DMV because they combine the two when it is a drivers license is no reason to pop a blood vessel.

Frankly it makes more sense to me to also offer them at high schools, but it couldn't only be that because homeschoolers/dropouts etc, so they'd still need to be somewhere else too.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

NATIONALIZE TACO / DEMOCRACY TUESDAY

everything is better with guacamole

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago
[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

We literally have none of those things.

Edit: except perhaps the citizenship certificate but I’ve never seen one before, but yeah they exist. We don’t have ranked voting, and elections aren’t holidays, although your employer must give you paid time off to vote, like 3 hours, and there are exceptions of course, like truckers for some reason don’t get the time off.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
261 points (86.6% liked)

People Twitter

5383 readers
781 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS