158
Britain's Sunak cites growing up without Sky TV as example of hardship
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
158 points (99.4% liked)
Not The Onion
12311 readers
338 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
His parents were a GP and owned a pharmacy. They just didn't get it for him/them for whatever reason.
They certainly could have afforded it if they wanted to.
There's a massive difference between just not having something as a child and not even being able to afford it at all.
I love these Tory twat stories where they try to relate to normal people. They're so far off the mark it highlights just how clueless they are about real life.
Sky wasn't even launched until he was 9. So a big chunk of his childhood it wouldn't have even been possible to get sky.
Loads of people - probably most people - didn't have Sky. When did shoveling cash at Murdoch become some sort of minimum entry level for society? Not having a TV would be vaguely interesting, but not having Sky means nothing