42
Swedish MPs green-light controversial US defense deal (www.lemonde.fr)
submitted 5 months ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/europe@feddit.de
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

It’s all done on a case-by-case basis. Joining NATO isn’t like Civ’s “your armies can travel in my territories” negotiation perk that applies to all of NATO. It needs to be a bilateral agreement. NATO is a mutual defense alliance, but it is absolutely not intended to undermine any member’s sovereignty.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8326 readers
2 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net