353
submitted 4 months ago by petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0x0@programming.dev 50 points 4 months ago

Linux, on the other hand, can easily boot up on a 10-year-old laptop with just 2GB of RAM, and work fine.

I'm not sure a modern day browser would be just fine with "only" 2GiB, unfortunately.

[-] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 months ago

Maybe with zRAM and a bit of swap it could run quite ok 🤷

[-] Cornelius@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago

As long as the drive the swap is on is an SSD, yeah absolutely

[-] WhiteHotaru@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago

4GB works. My kids use a T410 from 2010 with a SSD and it is a pleasant experience for daily use (browsing, YouTube, small Linux games)

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 15 points 4 months ago

I've tried Firefox limited to 1 GB for a laugh. It's usable. It won't do many tabs at the same time but it's usable.

You can actually go lower than that but you'll start to run into limitations with YouTube videos etc.

There are also other browsers out there that are more light-weight but perhaps not as feature-full as Firefox. Giving up extensions alone reduces a lot of complexity. If you fire up the package installer on any Linux distro and search for "browser" you'll find a ton. There aren't many engines but there are a lot of browsers.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Interesting. How do you limit RAM for an application?

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 11 points 4 months ago

With cgroups, it's a standard kernel feature. You can limit RAM, CPU, network access, lots of things. It's used in Docker, LXC, Kubernetes and lots of container solutions.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Cool, thank you!

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Im using a 4gb laptop with Xfce, and its definitely struggling sometimes. Even though it's usable, I doubt 2gb would be enough

[-] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

I used to have only 4GB in my old Linux HTPC, didn't take much for it to choke when using the browser. Upgraded to 16GB and no issues since

[-] Orfeluh@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I have 3GB of RAM on my PC running Linux Mint, using LibreWolf, it works pretty great for me, I mean I can't open 100 tabs, but 10-15 is possible

[-] pbjamm@beehaw.org 7 points 4 months ago
[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

That's what palemoon is for. It wouldn't be my first choice, but if you don't have the RAM to run ~~crysis~~ librewolf on high it'll work.

[-] airikr@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

There's Linux dists that can only requires less than 200 MB of RAM. Absolute Linux for an example, has a minimum system requirement of 64 MB RAM. Plenty of space left for memory hungry softwares like a browser.

[-] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I've tried to use Fedora Workstation in VM (GNOME Boxes) with only 1GiB RAM. And it is even usable and UI is responsible for GNOME and Firefox, but applications start more slowly. All those at cost of higher CPU usage. Probably it performs well because Fedora uses swap on ZRam, and it makes the system more reliable.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
353 points (96.1% liked)

Linux

48080 readers
776 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS