607
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 173 points 4 months ago

The tone here is surprisingly negative. Personally I'm happy with the efforts of the Flathub team 🤷

[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 74 points 4 months ago

As a newer Linux user I really like flatpaks.

I don't use them for most things I install but proprietary apps I want sandboxed or programs that have weird issues with dependencies I grab the flatpak.

[-] ayaya@lemdro.id 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For me on Arch, Flatpaks are kinda useless. I can maybe see the appeal for other distros but Arch already has up-to-date versions of everything and anything that's missing from the main repos is in the AUR.

I also don't like how it's a separate package manager, they take up more space, and to run things from the CLI it's flatpak run com.website.Something instead of just something. It's super cumbersome compared to using normal packages.

[-] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 4 months ago

I also prefer to get my software from the distro's repos, but for software from third parties, flatpak adds a security layer, making it more secure when compared, for example, to aur.

[-] moormaan@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Can you please elaborate on the security layer that flatpak adds? Some commentators here suggest Flathub is not secure.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Flatpak sandboxing (bubblewrap)

[-] mactan@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

fwiw those simple names exist, you just haven't added it to your PATH

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago

Lemmy (and phoronix) people are generally extremely repelled by new stuff in the Linux world

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Lemmy people are generally extremely repulsive.

[-] priapus@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago

Agreed, flatpaks are great for desktop apps. I use Nix for the majority of my packages, but I use flatpak for proprietary for the sandboxing.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 4 months ago

I honestly prefer Ansible. It can do lots of configuration and setup and install flatpaks.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

I honestly prefer Ansible.

I use Ansible all day. For work. Oh, god, is it sad compared to everything else in the space. RedHat had the choice between two in-house products and they chose poorly.

It can do lots of configuration and [set up] and install flatpaks.

We had that 20 years ago, just with a different product. The state of the art is now two generations newer.

[-] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

What are the alternatives you prefer?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 months ago

Well I know Ansible and it works for my needs. I briefly used Nix and it was worse. Ansible is nice because you can just install ansible and then apply a playbook.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
607 points (97.8% liked)

Linux

48199 readers
1036 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS