366
submitted 2 years ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

Look at this graph, when you know, then you know. Fuck all this distraction from the actual problem, orange man is a distraction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax_in_the_United_States

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Makes sense that profits went up, since this graph is not inflation adjusted

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

He's not a distraction if he gets re-elected.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago

That's probably why he won't win again. It would be amazing to have a convicted felon as president, he'd go from being a distraction to being the thing that causes serious unrest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I said he wouldn't win in 2016. I was wrong.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Okay so I'll say he will win in 2024 so then I'll be wrong as well. It would be crazy if he won as a convicted felon, after being impeached twice, after losing in 2020 by a landslide.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

He did not lose in 2020 by a landslide. That's just not true.

Biden won the election with 306 electoral votes and 51.3% of the national popular vote, compared to Trump's 232 electoral votes and 46.9% of the popular vote.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_elections

So suggesting he has no chance of winning when he came that close four years ago and he's likely not lost a huge number of fans is a little premature.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Numbers are even worse when you consider swing states. AZ, GA, and PA swung Biden's away by a net 40,000 votes. Razor thin margins, for any Dem candidate.

People fixate on the popular vote, but California going Blue by an extra million votes doesn't change anything

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I guess "landslide" is pretty subjective. The difference was 74 electoral votes, 7,059,526 voters. He only won

Trump won Michigan by 10,704 votes in 2016, Clinton won the popular vote by 2,868,686 votes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Michigan

I don't like this system so I'm done speculating.

[-] kelargo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It was only like 43000 votes across several swing states. Not by much at all.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Convicted Felon and Sex Offender Treason Trump did however lose the popular vote in a landslide and the electoral vote in a landslide.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The EC swings hard because it's winner take all. A few thousand votes can account for dozens of ECs in deference.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I agree with the Squid. We should all be worried. He came ridiculously close last time. Remember the electoral college is not helping. It was basically thousands of votes in 2020 that saved us.

[-] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago

Trump got the 2nd most votes of any presidential candidate in history in 2020. It wasn't a landslide.

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Trump is currently favored in polls and in betting markets. Few people care about the convictions. People who would vote for him definitely don't care about impeachments. The far-right has a very effective and expansive propaganda machine (old media, alternative media, and social media) that can counter any negative ("fake") news. Biden is a very weak candidate because of his physical and mental health, and the Democrats are ineffective at "controlling the narrative" compared to the Republicans. I think it'll probably be a close election, and if I was forced to bet, I'd bet on Trump winning.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

That doesn't sound amazing at all, that sounds totally horrible

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yea, amazing wasn't the right word choice. Probably should have used "absurd", "ridiculous" or "bizarre" instead.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Amazing - causing great surprise or wonder; astonishing

Nah you were all good imo lmao people just attribute amazing to positivity

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
366 points (95.8% liked)

News

36546 readers
404 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS