94
submitted 4 months ago by davel@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

Also from Jamie Zawinski yesterday: Mozilla's Original Sin

Some will tell you that Mozilla's worst decision was to accept funding from Google, and that may have been the first domino, but I hold that implementing DRM is what doomed them, as it led to their culture of capitulation. It demonstrated that their decisions were the decisions of a company shipping products, not those of a non-profit devoted to preserving the open web.

Those are different things and are very much in conflict. They picked one. They picked the wrong one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 months ago

DRM is opt-in. For sure it is kind of in favor of Netflix and Co. But they could just forced people to use Chrome, couldnt they?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -4 points 4 months ago

If they gave you a warning before it downloaded that would be fine. It also would be better if they had a option to completely disable it. (No popups)

But no, they decided to make it happen in the background with no user interaction. This is just one of my many complaints against Firefox.

[-] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 months ago

It is opt-in when you open a site that needs it.

Not defending DRM here but it does not get loaded until I allow it.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
94 points (71.8% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
11 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS