441
submitted 4 months ago by protein@programming.dev to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just "other professionals".

A thesis isn't just an exam, it's a real scientific paper.

And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.

And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Great points. Note: I’m not arguing against it as a concept. I’m just skeptical that it’ll happen, and even if it did, there wouldn’t likely be terrible consequences for the accused, especially as that’s what science is… new facts change the outcome vs choosing an outcome and matching facts to it.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
441 points (98.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43728 readers
1097 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS