113
Rare China L. (hexbear.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] D61@hexbear.net 3 points 4 months ago

The SCMP article does imply that the law serves both to try to keep a soldier's mind on the job as well as some legal consequences for anybody specifically targeting a soldier's spouse who is living alone during a deployment.

I kinda wonder if the law was created to be used in this particular way or if it was written broadly enough that it can be used in spiteful ways, as this instance seems to indicate. If you're asked for a divorce by your spouse and the first thing you do is start checking security camera footage/cell phone records for evidence of infidelity, that says more about you than your spouse.

It'd be interesting to know the specifics of the law (which does not seem to be quoted anywhere in the article) and if there was any specific history behind its creation and application in court.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

chapotraphouse

13499 readers
1003 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS