437
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Serinus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

the fur suit is the equivalent [of] leather and a ballgag

I mean, no. It's really not.

I do get what you're saying and generally agree otherwise. That one was just a bit much.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I agree. I’ve seen furries in public and while I find them odd, I never saw any of their costumes as inherently sexual.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

They do, though, and therein lies the non-issue.

[-] yuriy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

except they don’t though, where are you coming up with this?

say someone is attracted to women, right? is every female body they see gonna be viewed exclusively through a sexual lens?

some people get kinky with ropes, are those inherently sexual too? where’s the line?

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
437 points (96.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3503 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS