531
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Hypersapien@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

These days, kids identify them by the aspect ratio.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

People always said that Betamax was better quality than VHS. What never gets mentioned is that regular consumer TVs at the time weren't capable of displaying the difference in quality. To the average person they were the same.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/hGVVAQVdEOs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] cokane_88@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Vcr won vs betamax because it was cheaper to make a VCR, then weighed less than betamax so less material costs.

[-] 4am@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

VHS won because you could record more than 30 minutes on a tape

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You kinda can tell though. CRTs didn’t really use pixels, so it’s not like watching on today’s video equipment though

[-] toofpic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ummm..what? How do you think did CRTs show the picture?

[-] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What they're referring to is that analogue CRTs don't really have a fixed horizontal resolution. The screen has a finite number of horizontal lines (i.e. rows) which it moves down through on a regular-timed basis, but as the beam scans across horizontally it can basically be continuous (limited by the signal and the radius of the beam). This is why screen resolutions are referred to by their vertical resolutions alone (e.g. 360p = 360 lines, progressive scan [as opposed to interlaced]).

I'm probably wrong on the specifics, but that gives the gist and enough keywords to find a better explanation.

[EDIT: A word.]

VHS was capable of not bad quality, people just had a lot bad equipment.

Some TV shows (if they were crazy) were shot on film so you could re digitize them now in 4 or 8k and they’d look amazing. But there was also a lot of junk that was out there.

And as others have mentioned if you do an awful job of digitizing it then you could take something that looked good and throw all of that quality away. But if the tape wasn’t stored in good condition then it could just struggle to be digitized in the first place when done properly.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
531 points (95.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
1556 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS