68
If the ideal setup is many medium sized instances rather than a few huge ones, wouldn't that mean users would need to subscribe to duplicate communities in all of those instances? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 year ago by spiritedpause@sh.itjust.works to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Otherwise, if we have a lot of medium sized instances but the most popular communities are hosted on just a few huge instances, doesn't that defeat the purpose of distributing load across many instances?

If that's the case, how do we solve the cumbersome user experience of having to subscribe to the same community over and over again across a ton of medium instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 year ago

Just because you disagree with my opinion, doesn't make it "the wrong thinking" ๐Ÿ˜Š

I see what you mean, but there will always be someone who disagrees with the mods of a community. Instead of creating yet another c/ufo community, it would make more sense to create c/ufo_abductions fx. Your example is a good case for actually creating another c/ufo, but controversy is not going to be the issue every time someone wants to create an already existing community.

And I'm not saying there can't be any duplicate communities at all. I just think admins should give it some thought, before creating the 8th c/technology community.

As @maegul@lemmy.ml also said, it would be something I would also take into consideration as well, if someone asked to have a community created on my instance.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
68 points (94.7% liked)

Lemmy

11948 readers
10 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
nutomic@lemmy.ml