34
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

We're getting establishment bullshit no matter what. May as well have establishment bullshit that can beat Trump.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure is a recipe for more and more severe establishment bullshit.

If the billionaire fucks are shoving turds into our throats while calling those smelly turds "brownies," at least they need to hear us moan. We don't gotta dignify this bullshit with polite smiles all around.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure

Check my comment history and tell me if that seems like an apt description of my behavior.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online -2 points 4 months ago

Comrade, I got nothing personal against you or your conduct. I just mean to say we need to encourage complaints and suggestions which may seem unrealistic but which still point us in the right spiritual direction so to speak.

Then if you can add some actionable refinement or sharpen the complaints to make them better articulated, so much the better.

On the other hand if you just discourage, even with "good intentions", you're blocking the energy.

The status quo candidates just won't do.

We need a candidate with an affirmative, POSITIVE VISION for America. "The status quo is fine, we'll just do little tweaks around the edges because we don't wanna upset our billionaire donors" is NOT a positive vision for America. It just WILL NOT DO.

Simply defeating Trump with just any warm body isn't good enough.

Our real task is not to defeat Trump, but to BUILD a positive future for us all. Our task is to foster a world we actually want to live in, as opposed to this craptacular capitalist hellscape.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Simply defeating Trump with just any warm body isn’t good enough.

Well, the party isn't willing to do better and I'd be happy if they put up someone who can beat him. That person isn't Biden. Of course, I would also like it if the party would stop enabling genocide and move to the fucking left for the first time in fifty goddamned years, but I'll take what I can get.

A good first step would be for the party to admit they made a mistake. If the party can't take that first step, they're never gonna stop interpreting all events as evidence that they need to move to the right.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 1 points 4 months ago

Begging the party won't help.

It's our job to COERCE the party to do our bidding. The party must know if they displease their voters there are meaningful risks and downsides for them. It's our duty to engineer those meaningful risks and downsides or else the party has every reason to ignore us.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

At the moment, we're dealing with a party that would rather lose than listen. I want to get them to listen.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If you engineer meaningful risks and consequences for the party, they will HAVE to listen to you.

If you only plan to beg them politely, they could choose to ignore you. Whether or not they listened to you in this case would be completely at the pleasure of the party.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

If they're not gonna listen now, they're never gonna listen.

[-] hypnoton@discuss.online 0 points 4 months ago

Oh yea, which risks and consequences have you engineered for your truant representatives that they continue ignoring you?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Anyone who represents me lower than VP is a Republican. Democrats made sure of that when they pulled the funding of the progressive who was running in my district.

At the moment, just getting the party to put forward someone other than Biden is a win. I'm not in a position to engineer shit and neither are you.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
34 points (61.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
1599 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS