this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
10319 readers
5 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
📆 F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
📊 F1 Pace
2025 Calendar
| Location |
Date |
| 🇳🇱 Netherlands |
29-31 Aug |
| 🇮🇹 Italy |
05-07 Sep |
| 🇦🇿 Azerbaijan |
19-21 Sep |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore |
03-05 Oct |
| 🇺🇸 United States |
17-19 Oct |
| 🇲🇽 Mexico |
24-26 Oct |
| 🇧🇷 Brazil |
07-09 Nov |
| 🇺🇸 United States |
20-22 Nov |
| 🇶🇦 Qatar |
28-30 Nov |
| 🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi |
05-07 Dec |
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
- No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't understand how or why approval would've been needed, unless Red Bull asked just to be safe?
The damage should've been covered under normally allowed repairs during parc ferme rules:
I'll agree g iii could fit. If it was an out lap, or if he went into the pits at the end of the lap, the time wouldn't have been deleted, and although time was lost, was it "significant"?
And 40.3 specifies for repairs not covered in 40.2. So no harm in asking anyway, certainly better than a DQ.
The day I understand the FiA will be the day I know I've lost it.
You're definitely right that there's no harm in asking compared to a DQ.