268
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Not just a song that can be found in the archives, but one that almost everyone can hum, even today.

(Somebody asked what was meant by "today's...." Throw whatever you want out, somebody tossed out "Love me tender" as being a tune from in the 1860s.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Anyone who would say that would say Black Celebration instead.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I would've said Songs Of Faith And Devotion, but a short name made a better gag, and I could not bring myself to say Ultra.

And seriously, 101 fucking rules. It's an energetic best-of before they asked themselves what made them special and stripped back everything for the iconoclastic rose album everyone knows them for. Which is okay.

On reflection, far from sober, it is surprising the Deftones have never covered "In Your Room."

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

Funny. Seems like you see Violator as the start of a new era for them, and I see it as the end of the classic era. There are isolated songs I like after Violator, but no whole albums. (For reference, SoFaD was their newest album when I started listening, and I got it as the same time as Violator.)

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Violator is a band asking themselves what they're about and finding a crystal clear answer. The result is deliberately transitional. In going to the extremes, in excising everything that is not strictly necessary, they built a framework for a sound that is distinctly their own, without being more of what they'd already done.

Songs Of Faith And Devotion is bombastic, but all its power is built on that same crisp restraint. Especially in the 90s - it would have been easy to be louder and busier just by adding a little distortion, a little fuzz, a little taste of metal or grunge. Instead they stuck with clean synths and tasteful reverb, but made them fucking hit. (By contrast, see Playing The Angel. Or don't.)

Ultra does the opposite trick, applying that sparse soundscape to more-general instrumentation. It kinda works. Exciter does a better job of it, but still stumbles on tracks like "Dead Of Night" and "Comatose." Good demos! How long until they're complete? Oh. ("Freelove" nearly makes up for all of it.)

Everything after that... look, I actually like Playing The Angel, but I'm the kind of mutant who sincerely argues that Violator was merely okay. And even I can't find any love for Delta Machine.

All their work leading up to Violator was much more organic than how they made Violator. Their masterpiece, in the sense of getting their shit together and being taken seriously, was Construction Time Again, with "Everything Counts" as a tentpole. Some Great Reward was Gore going 'oh we can get real weird with this, huh' and leaning way the hell into the kink and the darkness, god bless him. Black Celebration was the peak of that arc.

Music For The Masses never rises to quite the same level, but in that album you can see the transition forming. "Behind The Wheel" is probably the crescendo of their old sound. Y'know, synthpop where someone's credited for playing the trash can. And then immediately there's "To Have And To Hold," which is maybe one degree too loose for Violator. It is emblematic of the sound they wanted.

[-] choco_crispies@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I agree with you. To me, Violator was the last album of the 2nd generation of their sound, the first being a lot more New Wave. Although, I do think the shift from New Wave to the more techno industrial 2nd era was more gradual.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
268 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
797 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS