1226

Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 4 months ago by Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

114 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

I'm something of a grammar Nazi, but just like I support letting "whom" die, "less" and "fewer" might as well just be interchangeable. There's no loss of language utility in doing so, unlike "literally"'s tragic demise.

[-] pythonoob@programming.dev 11 points 4 months ago

Ah don't let whom die. It's a really good lesson in subject vs object.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Literally has been used for emphasis, hyperbole, and metaphor since at least the late 18th century.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm aware, but it was done so sparingly, as opposed to being used to mean its opposite far more than its original meaning nowadays.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

That is how language works. It starts off small, then it catches on over time, and after a long time has passed, it either gets filtered out, or it becomes commonly used. The case for literally being used, for reasons other than its original one, started a couple hundred years ago. Today it is super commonly used that way, as it didn't get abandoned. You are mad at the nature of the beast.