1042
submitted 4 months ago by yokonzo@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 161 points 4 months ago

The only reason I would be against this is because it disincentivizes removing large parking lots, which are primarily a waste of space. If we could replace some of that wasted space with housing (which could also have solar slapped on it) that would be ideal.

Ok but like why wouldn't a solar farm be an acceptable alternative?

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

Putting solar farms in urban areas instead of rural ones doesn't make much sense.

[-] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

How so? A) Less transmission lines to where it's needed and b) more qualified/trained staff centralized to the solar installs.

I'm not against rural solar by any stretch but I can't fathom being against urban solar? We need to solar all the things.

[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

In my post I literally said that solar can be put on top of houses so I'm not sure why you want to argue with me about this. I just think urban areas are better served by homes with solar on top than parking lots with solar on top.

[-] KingOfTheCouch@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

Okay, reasonable enough, I had read your response as "no solar, just homes and put the solar in rural".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
1042 points (100.0% liked)

196

16501 readers
3293 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS