358

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/18014226

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 27 points 4 months ago

This isn't a court of law, or the privatized forced mandatory arbitration that has mostly replaced it.

Out of curiosity, in your view, what has Google done to deserve the benefit of the doubt?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That the person who reported it used a ML to try and find the setting to attempt to solve it, did not fill me with confidence of their abilities to manage this. They later admitted that they did have it enabled in some form.

They also never became specific about how well Gemini interpreted their tax result file. Did it give the proper number verbatim? That's pretty damming. Did it just reply "You're not getting a tax return"? That's just 50/50 odds.

[-] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I would much rather users on here not manipulate titles to make it sound worse than what the actual article is claiming. It's intentionally misleading.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

Every entity has the right of benefit of the doubt. Even if they are the worst entity known.

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
358 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59674 readers
1800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS