435

A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Butter is already made from carbon. They’re creating the same hydrocarbon chains that are in the fatty acids that butter is comprised of, just without the cow.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Also, for anyone who thinks that carbon bound up in fatty acid chains in butter is released back into the atmosphere through metabolism, I will direct your attention to the population US Midwest and Great Plains. These people have been proving that you can effectively sequester butter for many decades.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

To be honest, people probably cause more environmental damage from releasing methane after eating butter. Lol

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Luckily methane, while a potent greenhouse gas, breaks down in the atmosphere quickly. It does break down into CO2 and water, so the question quickly becomes: "are the farts of Midwesterners more potent than the amount of CO2 taken out of the atmosphere by making butter?"

My quick guess is luckily, no, they are not. Some amount of the butter will be stored in fatty tissues which will be sequestered 6 feet underground in a cement box eventually. Most will be shat in liquid or semi-solid form into a toilet to be processed by waste management. As long as they are responsible and compost it into nitrate rich fertilizer we should stay very comfortably ahead of the FBI (Fart to Butter Index).

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

There’s nothing good about methane release. It’s 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas. After ~12 years, it breaks down into CO2 and water, both of which continue to contribute to the problem, since water vapor has no easy way to return to Earth once in the upper atmosphere.

Human farts are not a concern, but cow farts are a huge contributor to climate change.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I definitely understand that. My commentary is mostly satire based in fact. Hence the FBI at the end.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I figured, but the first part concerned me. There are a lot of non-scientific comments on this post in a science community. I was being overly analytical. Sorry about that.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

No biggie. Even though it is satire, the analysis is sound. Given the amount of fatty acids that are stored in tissues in the body or expelled as "solid" waste, paired with the offset of dairy cows, so long as the waste is managed properly and not just left to aerobic decomposition, there should be able to be well in excess of 80x the volume if CO2 removed from the atmosphere as there is methane/CO2 released post-consumption. As long as whatever mega food conglomerate who starts making it uses atmospheric CO2 and doesn't burn limestone to obtain concentrated quantities quickly.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Absolutely. I’m hoping that by creating more products that capitalize on using carbon will encourage more VC investors in carbon capture projects.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
435 points (94.1% liked)

science

14885 readers
25 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS