view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
By acknowledging that Biden has absolutely no chance and needs to get the fuck over himself? If he actually cared about the country then he wouldn't be so dogmatic. It is not solid fact that he can win or that it needs to be him. There are other people who can do the job.
Literally anyone who wanted to run before? I happen to think Elizabeth Warren could have a shot if Biden weren't in the picture.
I don't need to get over myself I'm not running. I happen to think extremely lowly of myself tyvm. :P
Buttigieg, Warren, Whitehouse... all would be far better picks for actually beating Trump.
Harris. Harris. Harris. Har-ris. ~~Harris~~ Harris. Harris.
Did you get it that time? Do people need to repeat it for you again? How many times will it take for you to acknowledge that you know who the other option is?
Do people need to say it in an accent for you? Or maybe spell it out in binary code? What will it take?
Edit: Looks like not acknowledged then. Jesus christ, it really is like talking to MAGA.
I don't know a single person IRL who likes Harris more than Biden, during the 2020 primaries Biden was the milquetoast, too old candidate and Harris was actively hated for her history as a prosecutor. My grandfather is the only person I know who thought Harris was a smart VP choice. Biden at least gets some of the centrists and disaffected Republicans while losing the progressives, as a black woman Harris loses most of those, the progressives don't like her, my black friends don't like her because of the aforementioned prosecutor role, I just don't know who her support base is except for you. Her campaign didn't even do well enough to make it to the primaries, let alone compete. Bernie or Harris? I can see. Kamala I can't
The polling says otherwise. Your anecdotal evidence doesn't prove much.
Harris is polling better than Trump and Biden with independents, women and black voters, all the groups Biden is trying to get. Biden lost progressives because of his extreme stance on Gaza, which Harris distanced herself on.
Progressives are willing to compromise on Harris, no one is expecting Bernie Sanders to be the pick. Biden simply cannot win, he's behind by multiple points in the majority of swing states and has made no attempts to moderate his dealings with the far-right Israeli government.
Harris is the only viable option that has a chance.
Does it really? I've seen one single poll, conducted by CNN just after the debate, with 1045 people reached by telephone that showed Harris doing 4% better with a 3.5% margin of error. The more recent polls I've seen that lead has disappeared again. If there are other polls, especially polls with better power, that prove your point I'd love to see them. I'm by no means a Biden fan, but I also don't think Harris has a dependable edge.
Yes, the results of the CNN poll have been born out by subsequent polling:
[Source]
[Source]
Combined that with Biden already losing the majority of swing states by multiple points: [Source]
Now stop hiding behind your ignorance like it's an argument and wasting everyone's time. The data we do have shows Harris having a chance at least, Biden is sure loss, there's literally no coherent argument againat replacing him when he is the single worst option.