view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Everything on that site is tacky beyond belief. And wildly overpriced.
Of course. When you have literally millions of suckers in your cult begging for reasons to throw their money at you, you milk it for all its worth. This isn't geared towards the normal people who know how tacky this shit is. This is geared towards the ones that are so far to the right and have his dick shoved so far down their throat that they're flossing their teeth with his pubes.
That, and the MTGs of Congress who will buy these just to ~~kiss Trump's ass~~ "show their solidarity with the President". 5,000 pairs of overprices sneakers isn't tough to move when there are enough people who will buy them for the sole purpose of sucking up to him. Whether or not you've bought any of his products will likely be a test of loyalty in the near future, if it isn't already.
I thought its primarly money-laundering
Trump stands to make $1.5 million (minus expenses) from selling these. That's pocket change to Trump. Not worth getting involved with to clear maybe $1 million after the dust settles. He seems to always charge $300 each when he peddles his crap, which makes me think that's simply the sweet spot to maximize how much Trump can grift out of the rubes without going into sticker shock.
If this were money laundering, there wouldn't be a limit and the sneakers would be a lot more expensive. They wouldn't want rubes buying them because that means they'd have to actually produce the sneakers, increasing their expenses. They would simply be "available" at stupidly expensive prices so Trump's associates can funnel thousands or millions of dollars at a time to "buy" sneakers that will never arrive. You know. For re-sale. Or as a collector's item. Or to give away to friends/supporters. Or whatever excuse they can come up with when they're asked where the sneakers they supposedly bought ended up.
If this were money laundering, it's the dumbest money laundering scheme in the history of ever. Maximum exposure and risk for minimum reward. With that said, that could also be used as the reason to believe Trump would be dumb enough to do this. But he's got $45 million a month coming from Musk alone; he's not going to bother getting into elaborate money laundering schemes for 2% of that. Selling the sneakers to rubes is simply grabbing the low hanging fruit.
I'd expect nothing less from an evil conman.