There's a dangerous closeness of this to what's written in constitutional laws of many states, though, if they are understood literally.

I've been called a sovereign citizen for pointing out that after a stolen election a government is illegitimate, and that a law adopted in violation of constitutional law is not a law, and that being party to a contract requires consent, and so on. And that rights are not given by laws. Nobody can give you a right or take it away from you.

By "dangerous" I mean that you should explain to sovcits, reichsbuergers, citizens of USSR and such that what they believe in is not supported by existing mechanisms. Simply that. Their ideas are usually not any worse than what we have in really functioning laws, but they don't have the power to make them real.

Would you be a sovcit for arguing for equal rights in the 50's? Just trying an American example. Many people would consider you just as crazy.

In USSR of 60's and 70's dissidents were forcibly put into asylums, because "the society" (as in people having power in it) wanted them to be considered crazy. Where are the smug bastards who were doing that now? Oh, shit, they are still the elites in ex-Soviet states. By the way, Estonia's former PM Kaja Kallas, who likes to publicly lament over USSR taking over Baltics, is from such a family.

You shouldn't argue with the ethical part, because that'd be arguing in favor of "might makes right".

I think people who consider something morally right and are ready to oppose the whole world over it deserve utmost respect.

If you are finding yourself on the opposite side of someone much weaker than you and not threatening you, think again if you should be there.

I hope this wasn't too much text, at least better comprehensible that what's on the photo.