406
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I always thought this was a given. Like- who in their right mind would think otherwise?

Also… Note the absence of the usual suspects here? Wonder why they never have anything to say on posts like this.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

By usual suspects do you mean the “both sides same!” crowd?

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Yep. Them and the “anti-anyone the democrats have to offer.” crowd.

[-] Focal@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago

A charitable reading says that you should still research and verify the things that are "a given". I mean, YOU know it, I know it, we all know it here... But at least now we have an official report to point to when people try to downplay it?

Ah, who am I kidding? They wouldn't care anyway

[-] archonet@lemy.lol 1 points 1 month ago

I just recently spoke with someone who had 1. Not heard of project 2025 and 2. Tried to convince me that "Donald Trump is the first president to support gay marriage"

The thing you need to remember is, think of how dumb the average U.S. citizen is. Now realize half of them -- over 170 million people -- are even dumber than that.

See the problem?

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
406 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS