608
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Cynthia “Cyn” Carranza meticulously scavenged for a shady parking spot in the car she called home.

The overnight custodian at Disneyland has to sleep during the day - a difficulty for anyone, let alone when you're living in your car with two dogs. Ms Carranza says she makes $20.65 an hour (about £15.99) at the park but last summer, she couldn't afford rent in this Southern California city where the average apartment can run more than $2,000 (about £1,550) a month.

Ms Carranza, like others who work at the park, detailed to the BBC the financial hardships that come with working at what’s supposed to be the “Happiest Place on Earth”. About 10,000 union workers at Disneyland - the first of 12 parks created around the globe - are threatening to strike over the wages and what they say are retaliatory anti-union practices.

Hundreds of workers protested outside the park this week, with an array of signs and pins showing Mickey Mouse's gloved fist in defiance. 

“Mickey would want fair pay,” workers chanted outside Disneyland near the park's gates. 

They voted almost unanimously to authorise strike action on Friday, just days before union contract negotiations for workers are set to resume.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is not a story uniquely about them, is my point. This story could be about any employer in Anaheim, or in many parts of the country. This particular one just happens to be about Disney.

You would have us ignore the context this story exists in, which is perilous. Even if Disney doubled everybody's salary overnight, that wouldn't fix any of the issues that brought us to this point; there would still be millions of workers who can't afford to live, just a few less. But that's the mistake everybody makes - "Look at these awful people! Aren't they awful?!" without looking at the broader issues that enrich awful people and encourage people to be awful.

If you truly want things to change, you should welcome this talk, not push back against it.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Squid is right. VB is a bOtH siDeS account trying to get people to not vote. You should check out their post history. Have had them tagged as a troll for a couple months.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Ah, OK. Fuck that then.

Vote. Vote like your life depends on it. It does.

Biden sucks, but he can at least be convinced to do the right thing sometimes (and even if he can't, another election is four years away). Trump is a straight up fascist autocrat.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You would have us ignore the context this story exists in

No, I would have the person I responded to not twist this into their election agenda.

Please don't tell me what I would have people do. You are not psychic.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, but I can read.

We absolutely should be talking about this story in the broader context of our society, including, yes, the election. I don't know what conversations you've had with that user in the past, but the election and our leaders should absolutely be brought up here. They are the people with the power to fix things, after all.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What, specifically, could a president do to fix this? They aren't a dictator (unless Trump gets in). The president can't raise minimum wage. He can't force a corporation to pay people more. It has nothing to do with Trump and Biden.

Now if you want to talk about congress, fine. They're the ones who have to fix this.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

I think you're understating the power of the Presidency here. For one thing, they have veto power over Congress.

For another, many laws are broad and give a lot of leeway for interpretation, which is why presidents can accomplish a lot by executive order. As long as the Supreme Court doesn't step in anyway.

And third, don't underestimate the power of the bully pulpit. Presidents are looked at as the leaders of their party, and often set the legislative agenda. If a president says they want something done, their party members in Congress will find a way to get it done.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Okay:

What would Biden veto? Is there a "give people less money" bill?

What executive order could he make beyond what he has already made? He raised federal minimum wage to $15 an hour.

And he did use the bully pulpit. He did it when he raised the federal minimum wage.

But, of course, that doesn't pass the purity test.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

You won't get a specific answer to this.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I never do, because the only answer they can give to get what they want is "he should be a dictator."

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
608 points (99.4% liked)

News

23284 readers
1306 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS