401
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by remington@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The law says this:

Soweit möglich und sinnvoll sind international etablierte Lizenztexte zu verwenden. Haftungsansprüche von Lizenznehmern sind auszuschliessen, soweit dies rechtlich möglich ist.

As far as possible and expedient, internationally established licenses are to be used.

That sounds like they're not mandating specific licenses, but the GPL is a reasonable choice

[-] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 months ago

The only problem is that there are a number of licenses that purport to be open source, but which don't meet established definitions of the term. The license for Grayjay comes to mind. I'd hope that they blacklist certain licenses like that, rather than enforcing a specific one.

[-] StereoTypo@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

Huh, I hadn't heard about this. I hope Rossman doesn't think he's above criticism.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
401 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

18693 readers
33 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS