1604
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 29 points 4 months ago

"Hope and change" is back in it to win it.

Motherfucking Obama at it again.

[-] Marand@feddit.dk 1 points 4 months ago

Lol, Obama comming back would be incredible. Is he even allowed to? He already served two terms

[-] Osito@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

He's not allowed to but people are saying Michelle could be the pick, but that would only be marginally better than Kamala

They need Gretchen, Pete, or Kelly

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Jon Stewart. Someone go pull him and make him do it. There's no one better to take down Trump.

[-] tamal3@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

He'd be miserable the whole time, but we'd all be better off. Please Jon!

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

I mean I'd love it and I'm going back and forth on this comment. His biggest negative is those who lean right will see him exactly as he is "a New York Jew"

That said, who better to trounce Trump and humiliate his ass? I think the only thing better would be Michelle Obama. Trump would lose his absolute shit debating and/or losing to a woman let alone a black woman.

Watch that fucker drop the N bomb in a debate against her lol

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

A 2-woman ticket would never work. It's going to be very dicey having a woman leading the ticket with a man as VP, given how sexist the US electorate is.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

What's sexist is going on and on about how a woman is unelectable.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 months ago

Yes, reality is sexist. But, you can't just live in a fantasy land.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

A friend of mine was running a restaurant, and before a major business meeting, her 2nd said that he should do all the talking because the other party was sexist and wouldn't listen to a woman.

She fired his ass, rightfully. That is not what progress looks like. Step up and fight against sexism, don't concede to that shit.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

A complex vote involving an electoral college and an opposing candidate who is an open fascist isn't quite the same situation as running a restaurant.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You're right. Women deal with sexism in many facets of life. You are the example, not the exception.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago
[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Pointing out that the electorate is sexist is sexist. Gotcha.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

"The electorate" was racist when Obama ran too, and there were racists saying he shouldn't run too.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Yes, and his win sparked the racist backlash that ended with Trump being elected. Remember that Trump's original political role was the "birther" in chief. But, Obama was male, which meant he had to deal with racism, but not sexism. Clinton had to do with sexism but not racism. Harris will have to deal with both racism and sexism.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I suppose a woman of color will just have to wait then.🙄

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Let's hope not.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1604 points (99.3% liked)

News

23367 readers
1834 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS