617
Sexual dimorphism rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Perhaps a misunderstanding due to societies recent attempt at broadening the concepts of sex and gender

No, not at all.

There's no "mudding the waters", he's just ignorant of what "sexual dimorphism" meant, and not clever enough to check it before leaving a most ironic comment about "making it sexual".

You mean "muddying the waters", by the way. Another example of your ignorance.

I’ll stick with what can be tested, reproduced and proven

Don't lie. You're very much writing like a "only two genders and I don't see how 'sex' and 'gender' are different despite there being a very clear scientific consensus on it" - guy.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
617 points (100.0% liked)

196

16732 readers
2360 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS