1020
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

He's not even right. There's 18 million veterans and veterans went 55/45 Trump. That's 9 million not 16, and if he can't see why the active duty force voting against their commander in chief is significant then I have no help for him.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago

He’s not even right. There’s 18 million veterans and veterans went 55/45 Trump. That’s 9 million not 16, and if he can’t see why the active duty force voting against their commander in chief is significant then I have no help for him.

you're wrong 52% went with trump and for only the last election, not the previous one and i'm trying to figure out if you're a shill; ignorant; or misinformed.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Oh no, a 3 percent difference between pre election polling and exit polling!

This is rock solid evidence of skullduggery! Woe is me.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

you were off by 3 while i was off by 1; you're 3x further from reality that i am. lol

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You claimed 16 million veterans voted for Trump when it was actually 9 million. I'm not good at math but I think that's more than 1 percent.

Edit to add, that includes assuming every veteran votes. Adding in the apathy rate it's more like 4.5 million. So that's what 75%?

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Edit to add, that includes assuming every veteran votes. Adding in the apathy rate it’s more like 4.5 million. So that’s what 75%?

these were exit polls in 2016 were much worse and disprove your point even further; keep digging that hole for yourself.

also; you should stop using 2 lemmy accounts to try to prove your disapproved point; accept the loss and move on.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I haven't sourced anything from 2016, and the article you provided above is a 2020 pre-election poll.

Also, I don't have 2 Lemmy accounts and I'm not the one digging a hole here. I've never made any claims about the 2016 election. In fact if you go read my comments they're specifically about the military in 2020. You're the one who wanted to bring cold war veterans into the conversation and you couldn't even get the numbers right because you're in such a rush to paint us as conservative.

this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
1020 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1535 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS