387
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 243 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

a survey of 1,000 young people concluded that pornography can normalise sexual violence and harmful attitudes among children.

That's irrelevant. This argument assumes that age verification laws will reduce children's consumption of porn. The war on drugs has shown us that prohibition of this kind of stuff doesn't reduce anything and only ever makes it worse. All that will happen is children (and adults) will now go to worse/less moderated websites which will on average have more CSAM and other real sexual abuse.

[-] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

True. But the people advocating for these laws don't want to deal with nuance and compromise on what it would take to have a society where you educate people on sex in a healthy and positive way. These prohibitionists see the world as either bad or good - nothing in between. Good (how ever they decide to define it) must win no compromises, and the weapon that they use is unfounded fear of the bad and it works.

And the reason fear works is because it is easy and visceral and reality's complexity doesn't work for media's need for sound bites.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I think the part about IDs is what's important. They are not against porn, it's just a good excuse to account for another part of your activities. Which may be used to classify you or even blackmail you, but I think knowing your preferences is enough. It may allow secret services to predict whom you may like or may not.

Naturally it will allow to track you.

There are many factors affecting energy spent on doing something.

I personally think that this timeline is fucking bullshit and we got there by always choosing the lesser evil, so libertarian (you may make it left-libertarian, I genuinely don't care about left-right division because it's mostly traditional and imaginary) revolutions in all the civilized countries are long overdue.

Not even libertarian, maybe the Empire at War: Forces of Corruption game was onto something. Maybe the left-right and libertarian-statist distinctions are obsolete for our time just like Roman optimates-populares distinction. Maybe we need some new line, formalist-naturalist (as in formal law versus natural law) or something. Where the former part would be existing political mechanisms and the latter part would be saying "no" to fools, thieves and bandits.

[-] skaffi@infosec.pub 30 points 3 months ago

If you were a teenager, back when online porn were all pay sites, and so you were using Kazaa/Limewire instead, then you know.

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

That's not Jenna. That's a snuff film.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

That was never a thing. I grew up in the 90s and I could easily find free porn websites. My main limitation was dial-up internet, not knowing where to find it...

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I used to leech my neighbours WiFi on my PSP and download stories on the Sex Stories Text Repository because images were too slow.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sometimes that wasn't enough and the anticipation of not knowing whether you'll see a nipple or a dick on the next few lines of the image was preferable.

I got in the habit of opening multiple tabs while reading a text story, and then finishing up when the tabs finally loaded.

[-] sentientity@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure the normalization of sexual violence and harmful attitudes came from the adults in my life. If parents and teachers adequately teach kids to identify those things and know that they are unequivocally wrong, then teens who see unhealthy stuff in porn will notice and be critical of it. Probably indignant, too, since no one is more justice focused than a teen who has just learned something about the world.

The issue is backward ideas about relationships being reinforced by adults, either through active misogyny or just never talking about it. This argument boils my blood because the porn itself is not the problem. Awful attitudes about relationships and women start very early and they often come directly from parents themselves.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

Interesting. Maybe it's projection about the porn THEY watch?

[-] sentientity@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I honestly think it’s about degrading the right to free expression. But yes also probably. The people who cast women and kids as pawns in need of protection are usually not super respectful to the real women/kids in their lives.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Control addicts gotta get their fixes.

[-] Lightor@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

The word "can" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. A lot of things "can" have negative effects.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
387 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

58999 readers
5020 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS