143
submitted 4 months ago by PinkyCoyote@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Nobody can be certain of anyone’s intentions on the Internet,

except you, apparently, who is certain they can tell a good faith actor from a bad faith actor based solely on whether they have an opinion you have seen or one you agree with

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

No, of course, I cannot. I do not judge what category someone likely falls into based on whether what they say matches nearly word for word a "promoted" viewpoint. In some cases, I mostly agree with what they said but it's painfully obvious that person didn't come to that conclusion through their own thinking but is rather just parroting a screenshot of a post on the site formerly known as Twitter.

You have missed the entire point of my comment. If someone is likely to be in categories 2 or 3, I dismiss them if the viewpoint is otherwise not worthy of discussion, which it usually is not. I don't care if this causes me to misjudge the intentions of some people, because that is inevitable in any probability-based judgement system. What matters is picking what is most likely correct.

I don't feel that you have the ability to grasp this point and you're just going to come up with another argument I didn't make to attack.

[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I don't think you have the ability to treat other users as fully human

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

Oh, I understand they are usually human. I just don't think their viewpoints are worthy of discussion. And you make this judgement every day as well, even if you refuse to admit it. And perhaps you make it on grounds that are less sound.

[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And you make this judgement every day as well, even if you refuse to admit it

an absolutely unfalsifiable claim.

whatever you are doing over there it isn't science.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

No, it's not science. It's logic based on a few observations. If you don't observe the same things as I do, you will not come to the same conclusions.

[-] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

it's not logical, either.

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
143 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43982 readers
764 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS