230
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArcticDagger@feddit.dk 11 points 2 years ago

I think that hypothesis still holds as it has always assumed training data of sufficient quality. This study is more saying that the places where we've traditionally harvested training data from are beginning to be polluted by low-quality training data

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

It's almost like we need some kind of flag on AI-generated content to prevent it from ruining things.

[-] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

If that gets implemented, it would help AI devs and common people hanging online.

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

File it under "too good to happen". Most writing jobs are proofreading AI-generated shit these days. We'll need to wait until there's real money in writing scripts to de-pollute content.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
230 points (96.7% liked)

science

24915 readers
26 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS